Opponents of a bill to tighten voter identification requirements say it’s a solution in search of a problem.
The measure – which passed the House – would change state law so a voter can no longer sign an affidavit – if the voter doesn’t have proof of residency, such as a driver’s license or utility bill. Supporters say under current law, the voter who casts a ballot after signing an affidavit will have that vote counted – and there’s no way to retrieve that vote if there is a challenge to the voter.
The new language would require a driver’s license or a state issued ID, which could be obtained free of charge from the Department of Transportation. That free ID does not have to have a photo.
"The whole purpose of this bill is in no way, shape or form, to restrict anybody from voting," Deputy Secretary of State Jim Silrum told the committee. "It is to say, everybody may vote, but they have to have an ID to vote. And these are the ways they can obtain one."
Opponents say the law just puts up barriers for the elderly and Native Americans.
"On behalf of older Americans, who have largely shaped the values of our democracy, we urge great care to insure the right to vote is not undermined by an over-broad effort to address phantom allegations of voting abuse," said Josh Askvig of AARP.
In the 2012 general election, more than 10,500 affidavits were signed.
The Committee has not yet taken action.
